"Sometimes life gives us lessons sent in ridiculous packaging"
Dar Williams
As I explored on food waste last week, it only seems
appropriate to discuss about the packaging coming from our food products as
well.
For food safety and quality, we observe food being packaged by airtight wrappers, perhaps to a point of excess. A few months back, a German supermarket has begun embracing the idea of zero packaging, doing away with all the packaging from their products and asking patrons to bring their own containers to hold their purchases instead. While I find the concept novel, it will likely be a while before mainstream supermarket chains like Fariprice and Giant will contemplate such a concept, and in my opinion, doing this will probably be met with much resistance by Singaporeans, who may associate a lack of food packaging with unhygienic products.
For food safety and quality, we observe food being packaged by airtight wrappers, perhaps to a point of excess. A few months back, a German supermarket has begun embracing the idea of zero packaging, doing away with all the packaging from their products and asking patrons to bring their own containers to hold their purchases instead. While I find the concept novel, it will likely be a while before mainstream supermarket chains like Fariprice and Giant will contemplate such a concept, and in my opinion, doing this will probably be met with much resistance by Singaporeans, who may associate a lack of food packaging with unhygienic products.
Beyond
the packaging of food products itself, the bigger issue I wish to blog on would
concern the amount of packaging we use for takeaway food. The number of people
I observe who practise takeaway in school alone since the start of semester has
been staggering. Seeing many carry their food in disposable containers issued
by food stores, NUS has estimated that this has resulted in the use of some
54,000 plastic bags and containers from canteens every month (NUS, 2010).
While this takeaway culture could stem from Singapore’s cheap
food as compared to cooking for yourself, what disturbs me is that takeaway, or
‘dabao’, is emerging to become a social norm, possibly even a way to
accommodate a fast-paced working life. While Singaporeans love their food, what
has happened with eating directly at these areas, to enjoy the surroundings whilst
chowing on your favourite food?
I acknowledge that it may always be more convenient to eat
in the comfort of your home, but these acts of convenience has also led to
unnecessary amounts of disposables being used to store food and subsequently
thrown away. Excessive packaging like this can cause for more space in Semakau
Landfill to be filled up more quickly, such that the lifespan of Singapore’s
only landfill will decrease. What’s worse is that food packaging will not be
accepted by recycling facilities for recycling (NEA, 2011),
resulting in a one-way ticket for all of these containers to the incineration
plant and subsequently the landfill.
Semakau Landfill (above) already receives about
200,000 tonnes / year of incinerated waste, and has a lifespan reaching up to
2035. Do we really want to send more than what is necessary?
However,
this is not an irreversible problem, for there are Singaporean companies that seek
to minimize food packaging by coming up with innovative packaging materials and
design. One notable example would be Geometria, which believes in an Earth-to-Earth concept, ensuring their packaging is of
biodegradable material and decomposes together with any food waste.
While
innovations like this biodegradable ‘food-carrying pyramid’ seems like a panacea to takeaway
waste, F&B outlets might perceive these options as overly costly,
especially when conventional packaging comes at a fraction of the price.
(Source: www.geometria.sg)
(Source: www.geometria.sg)
There have also been different non-governmental efforts
highlighting the problem. In 2013, a youth, Ms Tamsin Chen, formed her team of like-minded individuals and launched
Operation Zero Waste Dabao, a 2-week
advocacy campaign to encourage the working community to curb food packaging.
However, given the short-term duration of the campaign, what I fear is that
this campaign was not able to reach out to enough people, and may have been
seen mostly as a one-off fad which people quickly forget.
Despite
Zero Waste Dabao Singapore’s showing great success in managing to save on >40,000
disposable containers and plastic cutlery over 2 weeks, the question lies in its
long-term impacts, on whether this has translated to working Singaporeans changing
their mindset on disposables
(Source: http://operationdabao.wordpress.com/)
(Source: http://operationdabao.wordpress.com/)
I believe that if we wish to curb the problem, we must be firstly
have the willingness to change our personal habits, even if at expense of
convenience. With reference to the takeaway culture in NUS, one habit that
students can practice would be to reduce packaging would be to bring a
container wherever they go. In NUS, this is encouraged by rewarding people who
use re-usable food containers with stickers, which can be accumulated to get
you a cheaper meal..
Bring
a container, get a sticker.
Get 5 stickers, save on your next meal – it’s as simple as that!
Get 5 stickers, save on your next meal – it’s as simple as that!
Initially motivated by the challenge in finding a seat in crowded
canteens, I decided to get a reward card and bring my container around campus,
and over the weeks have managed to earn myself a few good cheap meals whilst
doing my part for the environment. Despite being new to the idea of carrying a
container, I find myself liking the concept very much and hope the trend
catches on with other NUS students, who must be convinced that carrying an extra
container in their bag is not as inconvenient as they see it to be. I can also
see this idea being carried forward for the working community. In essence, takeaway
if you must, but there are always environmentally friendly methods to do it.
Now some have contested that washing your personal containers
after eating would waste more water, or that doing so conserves negligible
amounts of resources (Marsh
and Bugusu, 2007). Yet, imagine the ripple effect this can have if
thousands of Singaporeans do this at least once a day, lowering our packaging
waste and indicating to markets that we do not actually need so much takeaway
packaging. Moreover, even if what naysayers say is actually true, why not adopt
another alternatives to lower food packaging? We could always eat at the place
itself, or even cook your own meal every once in a while, and these ways would
equally reduce the packaging waste produced.
While the food fills your tummy, let’s not forget the waste
from our food, be it food itself or the packaging in which it comes from,
should be kept to a minimum, such that the landfills will never be too full of
thrash.
Till the next post!
References
Marsh, K. and Bugusu, B. (2007). Food Packaging and Its Environmental Impact. IFT Science Reports - Food Technology, [online] (04.07). Available at: http://www.ift.org/knowledge-center/read-ift-publications/science-reports/scientific-status-summaries/editorial/food-packaging-and-its-environmental-impact.aspx [Accessed 19 Oct. 2014].
NEA, (2011). A Guide to 3R Practices for Households. Singapore.
NUS, (2010). [online] Available at: http://www.nus.edu.sg/oes/prog/do/greenalert/jan1910_green_initiatives.html [Accessed 19 Oct. 2014].
References
Marsh, K. and Bugusu, B. (2007). Food Packaging and Its Environmental Impact. IFT Science Reports - Food Technology, [online] (04.07). Available at: http://www.ift.org/knowledge-center/read-ift-publications/science-reports/scientific-status-summaries/editorial/food-packaging-and-its-environmental-impact.aspx [Accessed 19 Oct. 2014].
NEA, (2011). A Guide to 3R Practices for Households. Singapore.
NUS, (2010). [online] Available at: http://www.nus.edu.sg/oes/prog/do/greenalert/jan1910_green_initiatives.html [Accessed 19 Oct. 2014].